|
V RaptureChrist
Newsletter
|
||||
Hillary Clinton says she is progressive. What does she mean? It does not mean progress; the term is similar to "liberal." Oxford Dictionary defines liberal as - "open to new behavior or opinions and willing to discard traditional values." That is why she is in favor of illegal immigrants, gun control, gay marriage.and abortion. Hillary Clinton is pro-choice, but what does that mean? It means pregnant women have the choice, under US law, of allowing that unborn baby to grow to maturity and be born, or to kill the unborn baby inside the womb BEFORE it is born. The woman has NO choice once the baby is born. A newly born baby is considered a person, while an unborn is NOT. Did you know that some people (such as blacks) were NOT considered persons under US laws? That is the reason they could be kept as slaves, the same as animals which are not considered persons. So, by passing laws that deny the right to be a person, people could have certain rights obliterated. In fact, the political party that favored slavery was the Democratic party. It is sad that most of the descendants of slaves belong to the party that favored their perpetual enslavement. "The Democratic party was positively and irrevocably wedded to the institution of Slavery... the fact will go into history that the Democratic party in its later years gave itself to Slavery." Sadly, the same is true now. They consider an unborn baby an animal and not a person. Understand that the problem is not the baby, but evil adults who say it is OK to kill the baby as long as you kill it inside the womb. People go to jail for injuring a puppy. However, it is OK to kill an unborn human. Dogs have more rights than an unborn human. But if it was permitted by the law to own slaves in the 1800's, due to the fact that there were laws that considered slaves as "not persons" but animals, I ask you these questions now: Do you consider it correct to take a person's right to live? For example, an old person with Alzheimer's dementia, should he be "euthanized"/killed because he becomes a burden to society? Should any adult with a disability be euthanized/killed because he is unproductive to society? Should any child who becomes too "difficult" for a mother to raise be euthanize/killed because the mental capacity of the mother is not able to cope with the "difficult" child? I hope your answers to those 3 questions is NO. Then, why would any adult American vote yes for pro-choice? What CHOICE does that baby have? An unborn baby is in the same group as a person with Alzheimer's, or a disabled person, or a sick child, or a misbehaving child. All of them are DEPENDENT on something or someone in order to continue living. What justification do we have to deny any of them the right to live? In order to enforce abortions, Hillary Clinton says that “deep-seated cultural codes, religious beliefs and structural biases have to be changed.” That is what abortion is about -- denying somebody the right to live. Abortion can lead to lifetime feelings of regret and remorse. But it is also a big health risk for the mother. She could die from the procedure. It would be safer for the mother to let the baby be born... and then kill it! But no, we as American citizens have not come that far yet! Even pro-choice women would not approve of that! How could Hillary say she is in favor of families and be in favor of abortions? Well, I do not understand what the difference is between killing the baby by sectioning pieces off his body while inside the womb, or killing it outside the womb. As I mentioned, it is safer for the mother, easier for the doctor, and a lot less painful for the baby to "kill" it AFTER it has been born. Let us understand why liberals want to teach children atheism and socialism. They want to replace God with science. Remember that Hillary says, “deep-seated cultural codes, religious beliefs and structural biases have to be changed.” What will the result be for us? Let us look at North Korea versus South Korea. In North Korea 99% of the population is atheist and the government promotes science. In fact, North Korea has nuclear weapons. Also, they have rockets with a range of thousand of miles that can reach us. Despite being a poor country, they created this technology in a few years. However, most of the people are very poor; many flee North Korea and go south every year. Millions have starved to death. People in the North are not allowed to say what they think. Freedom is near zero. There is a lot of corruption and crime. In contrast, South Korea is a first world country that produces cell phones, TV sets, computers, and cameras. People have a lot of freedom as to how they wish to worship and most people have a car. South Korea is a brilliant beacon of freedom, whereas the north lives in darkness, physical and spiritual. A flourishing democracy is the result of religious and civilian freedoms, versus a bankrupt socialist country is the result of atheism and liberal views. Why do I use this comparison? The two Koreas have a very similar climate and soil meaning food should not be a problem in North Korea, but people have no incentive to produce goods and services under communism. In fact, most people do not care. Few do any repairs. Sadly, as a result, the streets are full of potholes and crumbling buildings. Under communism, people feel that their lives have no purpose. With no incentives, everything falls into chaos and the result is a mess. Venezuela is another good example of a rich country that under socialism became poor. The former oil-rich nation has empty grocery stores. Another example is East Germany and West Germany. We are comparing a democracy in West Germany that allowed freedom to survive, with a dark grim East Germany that crushed freedom and used Soviet-style atheist communism. East Germany produced the Trabant a two cylinder car using a two stroke engine. That is the motor you find in weed eaters and other small appliances. West Germany produced the Porsche, Mercedes, Audi, Volkswagen, and BMW. What we see is two groups with the same language and history, but two different outcomes. Atheist couples have one child on average. Liberal Christians have two, and fundamentalist Christians have six. If there were only atheists the population of earth would decrease every year. Eventually, humans would become an extinct race. People who believe there is no reward want to have fun now; they do not care about raising little ones. Mostly, they expect someone else to do the heavy lifting, and here we are. Look at the birth rate in Russia. It is 1.3 children per couple, and that is a legacy of atheist communism. Most people do not believe in God anymore. USA sees the lowest birth rate ever. It is below replacement level now. As people become less religious, you will see it decline every year. Liberals see this as a success. They are anti-life and pro-death. Notice that they support abortion. However, the only thing keeping America afloat is an immigration from overseas that is massive. Remember that births are below replacement level now. What does that mean? It is that more people die than are born, and when people become old, there will not be enough young ones to support them. Sadly, many married couples have opted to have no children or just one. The result is that the social security system will run out of money in the very near future. I ask hard core liberals: "with a declining population, how do you expect to receive social security benefits in your later years?" The result is that they scream profanity at the top of their voices. It is a question they do not want to answer. Of course, there is an answer. It is euthanasia, or killing old people when they are no longer useful to the government. Just like liberals want to kill the old, they also want to kill the young. Abortion has killed over 50 million unborn children since 1973 when the supreme court helped Roe Vs. Wade to pass. God hears the slaughter of innocence. He will judge murderers. Socialism preaches taking money from the rich and giving it to the poor. Eventually, you run out of money. Atheism wants to take a God fearing moral society and replace it with immoral people who believe in evolution, abortion and euthanasia. Eventually you run out of law abiding citizens and are only left with uncaring evil people. Please make sure you do not vote for a person who stands against God. With your vote you will enable somebody to do good or to do evil. |
For atheists, evolution is their primer. A lion spots a herd of zebras and it does not attack the strongest one, instead, it looks for the one that is old and weak, or very young and inexperienced.
God says that the Devil is like a hungry lion looking for the one he can devour. 1 PETER 5:8 Do you want a society where morals are based on science, where only the strong
survive and weak ones are shown no mercy? This is what atheism preaches to you. It is not
"help those in need," but instead "think only of number one." MATTHEW 25:31-36
In PSALM 106:37-39, God speaks specifically against killing innocent children and babies. He says of His people:
“They mingled with the nations and adopted their customs. They worshiped their idols which became a snare to them. They sacrificed their sons and their daughters to demons. They shed innocent blood, the blood of their sons and daughters whom they sacrificed to the
idols of Canaan and the land was desecrated by their blood.”
I implore to all black women and men in America to think back, to the time when their ancestors were slaves and were denied the right to be a person, and that right was denied by the Democratic Party. Well, all life matters, including unborn babies lives. Do not be deceived by Satan into believing that God will not execute judgment on the killing of unborn babies. They also have the right to live. Destruction of life starts with the unborn, the one that cannot defend itself, but is dependent on the life of the mother to nourish it. God sanctified and ordained Jeremiah as a prophet before he was out of the womb. How can pro-choice people argue that he was not a person? JEREMIAH 1:5 God views the unborn child as a person. That is why if an unborn child dies as a result of a fight, the offender would be put to death. Please look at: EXODUS 21:22-23 According to James L Melton, "If the woman has a premature birth and the child lives ("no mischief follows"), then there's no death penalty. However, if the child dies (or the woman dies) God says the death penalty applies: "thou shalt give life for life." Why would God require the death penalty if He didn't consider the unborn child to be a human being?" Look at: God HATES those who shed innocent blood! DEUTERONOMY 27:25 Mr. Melton says, "Who could possibly be more innocent than an unborn baby?! Yet, our society has become so wicked that it condones the slaying of 1.5 million innocent children every year. The Bible says that God HATES people who do this." Jesse Jackson said that his mother contemplated abortion, but he is glad she decided against it. I have yet to meet one person who wished they were aborted. Keep the golden rule - do no harm to other people. |
|||
